Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 1649. In this matter between Const. P. 4669/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Ali Ghulam (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 4669/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 1649 PARTIES: Ali Ghulam (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 29-MAY-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed, Hon'ble Justice Ms. Sana Akram Minhas(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI CP No. D–4669 of 2024 ( Ali Ghulam v. Province of Sindh & Others ) _______________________________________________ _____ DATE: ORDER WITH SIGNATURE(s) OF JUDGE(s) _________________________________________________ ___

For Orders as to Maintainability of Petition

29-5-2025

Mr. Syed Amir Ali Shah Jeelani, Advocate for Petitioner

-----------------------------------

1. Sana Akram Minhas J: This Petition was filed on 23.9.2024, and on the very first date of hearing (i.e. 25.9.2024), the Court raised concerns regarding its maintainability. A perusal of the Petition also reveals that it fails to identify or specify the exact parcel of land over which the Petitioner claims a right.

2. Despite the lapse of considerable time since the filing of the Petition, the Petitioner has not produced any title documents in support of his alleged possession of the land, which he asserts has existed since the time of his forefathers (as cl aimed in paragraph 3 of the Petition) and in respect of which he seeks “protection and restoration” (as stated in paragraph 9).

3. When confronted with the fundamental requirement that any relief concerning immovable property must be preceded by a demonstrat ion of legal title or lawful entitlement, Counsel for the Petitioner was unable to offer any satisfactory response. Instead, reliance was merely placed on the vague averments in said paragraph 3 regarding ancestral possession.

4. It is a firmly established principle of law that mere occupation, in the absence of a lawful right or entitlement, does not confer upon the occupier any enforceable right or protection under the law. In the absence of documentary evidence establishing ownership or lawful possession, the Petitioner’s status is reduced to that of an encroacher or trespasser. In such circumstances, no relief can be granted by this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of Pakistan, 1973, based on a claim that is not recognized by law.

5. Since the Petition is devoid of any legal merit and is founded on a misconceived premise, it is hereby dismissed in limine.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant