Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2026 SHC 932. In this matter between Const. P. 1552/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Danish Saeed (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1552/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 932 PARTIES: Danish Saeed (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 13-APR-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ 1

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. D-1552 of 2026 (Danish Saeed versus Province of Sindh & others)

Date Order with signature of Judge

Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

For hearing of main case

Date of hearing and order: 13.4.2026

Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Pathan advocate for the petitioner Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi, Assistant AG Mr. Munir Ahmed Shaikh, Accounts Officer, Accountant General Sindh Mr. Yar Muhammad Bozdar, D.S.-I LU, Board of Revenue Sindh Mr. Mushtaque Ali, Focal Person for Court, Board of Revenue ---------------------

ORDER

Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. Petitioner Danish Saeed has filed this Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, with the following prayer: -

Direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to finalize the case of the petitioner for release of his pensionary benefits alongwith amount of commutation, payment of final G.P. fund amount alongwith 365 days encashme nt of leave and gratuity which have not been paid to the petitioner.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Commissioner (BPS -17) through a competitive examination in the year 1991. He was subsequently promoted to BPS-18 on the recommendations of the competent committee and, in due course, attained the rank of BPS-21. Upon reaching the age of superannuation, he retired from service as Member Judicial, Board of Revenue (BPS-21) on 30.09.2024, in pursuance of notification dated 20.03.2024. 3. It is sub mitted that, despite his retirement, the petitioner has not been granted his regular pensionary benefits. Although he has been receiving anticipatory pension since November 2025, the remaining pensionary dues have not been released as the concerned department, i.e., the Board of Revenue, has yet to forward his pension case to the Accountant General for necessary processing and compliance. 4. Learned AAG submits that within two weeks time the pensionary papers of the petitioner shall be forwarded to the off ice of Accountant General for releasing his service dues as per law. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to.

2

5. In view of the above position, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the respondent department to forward the petitioner’s pension case to the office of the Accountant General within two weeks from the date of this order. Thereafter, a compliance report shall be submitted to this Court.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant