Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ABDUL GHAFOOR VS Respondent: Mst. AMTUL SAEEDA
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Mamoon Kazi Title: ABDUL GHAFOOR vs Mst. AMTUL SAEEDA Case No.:Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos.512 of 1991 and No,83 of 1993 in First
Rent Appeal No,1076 of 1987 Date of Judgment:1994-02-13 Reported As: 1994 MLD 1463 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER ' The appeal filed by the appellant against the order of the learned IIIrd Senior Civil Judge and Rent Controller, Karachi East, dated 28-9-1987 was dismissed for non-prosecution by my learned brother, Abdul Rahim Kazi, J., vide order, dated 18-11-1992, because the counsel for the appellant then appearing on his behalf had pleaded no instructions from him. It appears that the learned counsel also placed an envelope before the Court which indicated that the notice sent to the appellant had been returned undelivered with an ' to take the compartment subject by virtue of their appearance in the annual examination. The denial of this concession to them would amount to discrimination and generate frustration. Accordingly, in view of what has been stated above all these writ petitions are accepted and respondent-Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education is directed to grant concessional marks as envisaged and under Rule 12 of the Secondary School Examination Rules to the petitioners after full verification. There shall be no order as to costs.