Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2026 SHC 528. In this matter between Const. P. 490/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Azhar Ali Shaikh & others (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 490/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 528 PARTIES: Azhar Ali Shaikh & others (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 27-FEB-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ 1

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. D-490 of 2026

Date Order with signature of Judge

1. For order on CMA No.4752/2026 (Urgency) 2. For order on CMA No.4753/2026 (Contempt) 3. For order on CMA No.4754/2026 (Recalling)

27.2.2026

Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Buledi advocate for the petitioners Respondent No.21 Nadeem Shaikh is present in person ---------------------

1. Urgency granted. 2-3. Respondent No.21 has filed these applications for contempt and recalling of the order dated 12.2.2026 passed by this Court , however, when confronted the legal position of the case that the matter is pending before the learned trial Court and he can move proper application before that Court if his cause still subsists, he seeks withdrawal o f the listed applications on the aforesaid analogy . Both applications are disposed of as not pressed.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant