Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: FAQIR MUHAMMAD and others VS Respondent: CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER and another
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Raja Afrasiab Khan Title: FAQIR MUHAMMAD and others vs CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER and another Case No.: Writ Petition No,2353 and Civil Miscellaneous No,1 of 1991 Date of Judgment:1991-03-30 Reported As: 1991 CLC 1432 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER ' Admittedly, the land in dispute comprised in Khasra No,416 was allotted to respondent No,2, Nawabzada Sadaqat Ali Khan by the competent authority. The grievance of the petitioner is that if allotment of the land in dispute is not cancelled from the name of respondent No,2, it will definitely create unhygienic conditions in the village inasmuch as the dirty water of the entire village shall remain in its streets creating serious problems for the villagers. This itself cannot be a legal ground to declare the allotment of the land in question in the name of the contesting respondent without lawful authority and of no legal consequence. The remedy of the petitioner may lie somewhere else either before respondent No,1 or before the Provincial Government. Learned counsel is unable to demonstrate before me as to how petitioner is an aggrieved person within the meaning of Article 199 of the Constitution. Definitely, he has no locus standi to challenge the allotment of the land in dispute. No case whatsoever has been made out for interference. This being so, there is no force in the petition which is dismissed in limine. 2. In view of the dismissal of the main petition, C.M. No,1 of 1991 does not arise and as such the same is also disposed of.