Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MAUJ DIN through Legal Heirs and others VS Respondent: SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, JUDGMENT respondents was to be cancelled had been recorded as No,17 whereas its correct number was 19, therefore, Khata No,19 would be read instead of 17
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, Khalil-ur-Rehman Ramday, Munir A. Sheikh Title:MAUJ DIN through Legal Heirs and others vs SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER,
JUDGMENT
respondents was to be cancelled had been recorded as No,17 whereas its correct number was 19, therefore, Khata No,19 would be read instead of 17 Date of Judgment:2002-04-04 Reported As: 2002 SCMR 2001 Result: Order accordingly Judgment JUDGMENT MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.---We have gone through the record with the assistance of Mr. Taqi Ahmed Khan, learned Advocate Supreme Court for the petitioners and Mr. A.R. Shaukat, learned Senior Advocate Supreme Court for the respondents. After perusal of the relevant material available on the record, it transpired that the calculation in the terms of P.I. Units given in the judgment under review is correct in accordance with the entries of the said record. The petitioner actually wants rehearing to reopen the matter relating to calculation of P.I. Units in relation to area, which is not permissible. No case of mistake on the face of record as alleged in this petition has been made out. It may, however, be observed that during hearing of this petition it was noticed that in the judgment under review number of Khata from where the land of the respondents is to be cancelled has been recorded as No,17 whereas its correct number is 19, therefore, Khata No,19 shall be read instead of 17 in the judgment and, subject to above modification, this petition is dismissed.