Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD WALAYAT And Another VS Respondent: LIAQAT HAYAT And Another
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Nasim Hasan Shah, Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Saad Saood Jan Title: MUHAMMAD WALAYAT And Another vs LIAQAT HAYAT And Another Case No.:Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.400 of 1980 Civil Revision
No.847 of 1976 Date of Judgment:1987-04-18 Reported As: 1987 SCMR 1357 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment ORDER SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.--This petition for special leave to appeal is by the vendees-defendants in a pre-emption suit. They were aggrieved by an order of the trial Court extending the date for making the deposit of Zar-e-punjum. The High Court in revisional jurisdiction has declined to interfere with its order. There can be little doubt that under section 22 (4), Pre-emption Act, the trial Court was competent to extend time for making the deposit. See Hidayatullah v. Murad A.I PLD 1972 SC 69. Before making the impugned order the trial Court recorded a finding that sufficient cause existed for granting the extension. This finding does' not suffer from any infirmity. The petition is accordingly dismissed