Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 730/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Talha Nayaz s/o Muhammad Niyaz (Petitioner) — 2025 SHC 3210

Official Citation: 2025 SHC 3210

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Const. P. 730/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Talha Nayaz s/o Muhammad Niyaz (Petitioner)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 3210. In this matter between Const. P. 730/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Talha Nayaz s/o Muhammad Niyaz (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 730/2025 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3210 PARTIES: Muhammad Talha Nayaz s/o Muhammad Niyaz (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 15-SEP-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-730 of 2025

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

For order as to non-prosecution of main case

15.9.2025

None present for the petitioner --------------------------------

None present for the petitioner without intimation. On the last date of hearing i.e. 01.9.2025, this Court ordered for issuance of notices to the respondents, but the petitioner has failed to make compliance of office objections as well as the order pa ssed by this Court. Today, absence of the petitioner as well as his counsel shows their lack of interest in pursuing this petition, which is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories