Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MAJITHIA VS Respondent: GOVERNMENT OF PUNJABHonorable Justice MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 248
[Service Tribunal Punjab]
Present: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada, Chairman
Ch. MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE MAJITHIA
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and another
Appeal No. 798/392 of 1987, decided on 15th December, 1990.
Civil service---
---- Annual Confidential Report---Adverse remarks, expunction of---Appellant, Additional District and Sessions Judge was communicated adverse remarks recorded by an Inspection Judge against him---Remarks as conveyed appearing to be an honest assessment of work and conduct of appellant which otherwise came under review before High Court from time to time and could also be based on credible information received from Members of the Bar---Conduct of appellant during period under report, also came under judicial scrutiny in a petition for cancellation of bail before arrest in a case under S. 302, Penal Code, granted by appellant and while cancelling the bail it was noticed by High Court that conduct of the appellant was objectionable as he failed to observe normal practice of Court in not making necessary inquiry and requisite certificate as to the disposal of a previous application by the Sessions Judge and, pending petition for cancellation of bail in High Court granted bail after arrest to other accused in the cross-case by taking sting out of the case and to satisfy complainant party---Conduct of appellant was condemned as most reprehensible---Appeal against adverse remarks being devoid of any merits was dismissed.
Government of the Punjab v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC 684 rel.
Muhammad Sayeed Akhtar for Appellant.
A.G. Humayun, D.A. for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 24th November, .1990.