Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2006 PLC(CS) 1179

MUHAMMAD NAEEM VS SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION through Chairman Board of Director

Petitioner: MUHAMMAD NAEEM VS Respondent: SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION through Chairman Board of DirectorHonorable Justice MOAZZAM HAYATShabbir Ahmad Bhutta,Kh. Tahir Ahmad

Court: FEDERAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

2006 P L C (C

2006 P L C (C.S.) 1179

[Federal Service Tribunal]

Before Moazzam Hayat and Jehan Zaib Burki, Members

MUHAMMAD NAEEM

Versus

SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION through Chairman Board of Director, Ministry of Finance Government of Pakistan Islamabad and 4 others

Appeal No.45(L)(C.S.) of 2001, decided on 11th September, 2004.

Small Business Finance Corporation Employees (Efficiency & Discipline) Regulations, 1995---

----Regis. 2(4) & 9-C---Service Tribunals (Procedure) Rules, 1973, R.5(1)---Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4---Removal from service---Appeal against---Appellant was removed from service after charge-sheeting him on allegation that he had prepared false verification reports regarding guarantors, their business and investment of equity---Charge levelled against appellant was proved in the inquiry held by Inquiry Officer---Defence taken by appellant was that all said documents were correctly verified by him which were also verified by Manager---Task of verification in question having been entrusted to appellant, it was his responsibility to ensure that verifications were not false---Supervisory officer normally depended on his subordinate staff and subordinate staff, could not shift the charge levelled against it on Supervisory Officer---Even otherwise obeying unlawful orders of superiors was not a good defence in Departmental proceedings against delinquent civil servant---Appellant was duty bound to follow the rules in letter and spirit and any deviation from such rules for any reason was an act of misconduct on his part---Illegal order of a superior Authority would not exonerate appellant of the charge of deviation from rules---Appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

Shabbir Ahmad Bhutta for Appellant.

Kh. Tahir Ahmad for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 11th September, 2004.

Related Legal Research & Directories