Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: KHALID ETC. VS Respondent: THE TATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Gulbaz Khan Title: KHALID ETC. vs THE TATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No, 1590/B of 1977 Date of Judgment:1997-06-15 Reported As: 1978 P Cr. L J 800 Result: Petition allowed
Judgment ORDER ' This order would dispose of Cr!. Misc. No, 1590-B/77, filed by Khalid and five others and Cr1. Misc. No, 1880-B/77, filed by Bashir Ahmad and Abdul Wahid, as they are accused of the same case. 2. The learned Spl. P. P. States that he has not received the record of this case. It has been often seen that when the notices are issued the record is not produced by the Investigating Officer. The learned Spl. P. P. May bring it to the notice of Inspeetor-General of Police for appropriate action. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners took me through the F. I. R. Of this case. It is given in the F. I. R. That a mob attacked gate-man, Ghulam Mustafa, on duty and removed locking key, broke telephone and put it on fire. The mob entered the goods office shed and put it on fire and was trying .4 to remove the track. Nobody has been named as accused person in the F. I. R., nor anybody arrested at the spot. Since it is not given in the F. I. R. As to which of the accused is responsible for setting the goods office on fire and was trying to remove the track, I confirm the bail.