MUMTAZ ALAM DURRANI vs Mian MUHAMMAD AYOOB AND 3 OTHERS — 1972 PLC 148

Citation: 1972 PLC 148

Court: Labour Court

Year: 1971

Decision Date: 1971-05-11

Parties: MUMTAZ ALAM DURRANI vs Mian MUHAMMAD AYOOB AND 3 OTHERS

Headnotes

Case cited as 1972 PLC 148

Judgment Text

Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Shoukat Ali A. Nanji, Hidayat Hussain Title: MUMTAZ ALAM DURRANI vs Mian MUHAMMAD AYOOB AND 3 OTHERS Case No.: Application No. 38 of 1970 Date of Judgment:1971-05-11 Reported As: 1972 PLC 148 Result: N/A Judgment ORDER HIDAYAT HUSSAIN (CHAIRMAN).-Complainant Mumtaz Alam Durrani alleges that his services were terminated by the Accused on 20th October 1970 during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings before the Conciliator. The Accused were charged to the effect that they terminated the service of the com--plainant through order dated 20th October 1970 during the pendency of the conciliation proceedings and that they refused to continue to employ the complainant on the ground that he was an officer of the Trade Union. They faced trial under sections 53 and 60 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. The summary procedure prescribed for warrant trial was adopted in this case. The Accused deny that any conciliation proceedings were pending on 20th October 1971 or that they terminated the services of the Complainant on the ground that he was an office bearer of the Trade Union. According to them the re--organization of the organization was contemplated long before the Union was formed and the termination of ' the services of the complainant resulted on account of retrenchment due to re-organization. Points which rise particularly in this case are:- (a) Whether the conciliation proceedings were pending. (b) Whether the Accused…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.