Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 1982/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Syed Aslam Shah (Petitioner) — 2025 SHC 1526

Official Citation: 2025 SHC 1526

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Const. P. 1982/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Syed Aslam Shah (Petitioner)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2025 SHC 1526. In this matter between Const. P. 1982/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Syed Aslam Shah (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1982/2025 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 1526 PARTIES: Syed Aslam Shah (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 22-MAY-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ Page 1

THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

Before: Justice Mohammad Karim Khan Agha Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon

CP No D- 1982 of 2025 (Syed Aslam Shah v Federation of Pakistan & others)

Date of hearing and order:- 22.5.2025 Syed Shoa-un-Nabi advocate for the petitioner

O R D E R

Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J., The petitioner respectfully prays: To declare the respondents' act of stopping the medical treatment facility illegal, unfair, mala fide, and a violation of fundamental rights , leading to the cancellation of the letter issued to the medical officer.

To direct the respondents to immediately restore the medical facility and allow the petitioner to continue his treatment as before.

To award the cost of this petition.

To grant any other relief deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.

2. The petitioner, a retired employee of respondents 2 -4 since January 2024, h as a critical need for continued medical facilities as a heart patient. Despite an existing CBA agreement and the petitioner's urgent medical requirements, these facilities were abruptly discontinued on July 27, 2024 , by the Pakistan State Oil Company (PSO ). Attempts to restore this vital support ha s been ignored by respondents 3 and 4, jeopardizing the petitioner's life and causing significant distress. This cessation of a fundamental right to medical care is a clear violation of natural justice asserted by the petitioner.

3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner on the maintainability of the petition and perused the record with his assistance.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner heavily relies on PSO's Medical Policy , which extends medical benefits to permanent employees (Attachments A & B) and their eligible dependents, including minor children, unmarried unemployed daughters, and parents (with restrictions for those joining after January 1, 2020). He argued that u nder this policy, employees receive d Medical Folders for consultations with company doctors at designated dispensaries (PSO House & Makson Kot). He added that the d octors provide dispensary-level treatment , with prescribed patent medicines available from a designated chemist using EMF 11/12 forms. If a medicine is unavailable, a Non- availability Certificate is required for reimbursement. While home visits by company doctors are on the employee's account, medicines are provided free. He further submitted that the Company doctors can also refer patients to panel specialists, pathologists, and

Page 2

radiologists for tests, with expenses covered by PSO. Specialists' recommended medicines are supplied by designated chemists. Hospitalization and surgical treatment for the employee, spouse, and eligible children are covered by company health insurance via an accepted insurance card. On -duty injury -related hospitalization is also covered. However, the policy excludes ante & postnatal treatment, childbearing expenses, optical/dental care, dentures, hearing aids, and treatment for diseases resulting from neglecting company -arranged preventive inoculations. He lastly submitted that the Medical assistance is also not provided, if an employee is under notice of termination . Finally, a Medical Allowance of Rs. 2,200/ - per month is given to permanent employees in locations without medical facilities or Social Security Scheme applicability. He prayed for allowing this petition.

5. Without addressing the case's merits, this petition is settled in the terms that if PSO's medical policy covers retired employees and the petitioner's situation aligns with it, medical benefits shall be provided without discrimination.

6. This constitution petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

JUDGE

HEAD OF CONST. BENCHES

SHAFI

Related Legal Research & Directories