Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2010 YLR 383

MUHAMMAD SHOAIB and 3 others vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary

Petitioner: MUHAMMAD SHOAIB and 3 others VS Respondent: PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Land Utilization Department and another

Court: Sindh High Court Decision Date: 2009-04-06

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Mushir Alam Title:MUHAMMAD SHOAIB and 3 others vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary

Land Utilization Department and another Case No.: Suit No,1369 of 2006 Date of Judgment:2009-04-06 Reported As: 2010 YLR 383 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER MUSHIR ALAM, J.---Plaintiff claims right and title in the Na-class property on the basis of the purported entry dated 30-3-2003, which claim is denied and the Entry No,82 of Deh Form-VII which again is claimed on the basis of Entry No,45 as alleged by the defendant No,1 as fraudulent and fictitious. On a specific question to Addl. A.-G. It is stated that since interim orders is operating no action was taken. Suffice to say that the defendant will be at liberty to take such action. As may be permissible under the law in discharging of public duties and in case where the A record is fictitious and fraudulent and ad interim orders are operating it is their duty to apply to the Court for vacation thereof, which invariably is not done by the public functionaries and allow the matter to linger on in court. Till such time the defendant No,1 carry out the investigation and inquiry. The parties may not change the complexion of the property nor create any third party interest in the property. Listed application stand disposed of, let copy of this order be sent to Secretary (Land Utilization) B.O.R. for taking appropriate action in all such cases of like nature pending in this Court, which are being neglected by the concerned officer for obvious reason needs no explanation. Result of enquiry to be sent to court within four weeks.

---

## Page 2

revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.

Related Legal Research & Directories