Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD ASLAM VS Respondent: STATE
1986 S C M R 263
Present: Aslam Riaz Hussain, Nasim Hasan Shah and Shafiur Rahman, JJ
MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑‑Petitioner
versus
THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 93 of 1985, decided on 28th April, 1985.
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Offences in Respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), S. 10‑‑Interpretation of‑‑Leave to appeal‑ granted to consider true interpretation of S 10 of Ordinance
Mian Nusratullah, Senior Advocate Supreme Court with Rana Maqbool Ahmad Qadri, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
Malik Muhammad Qayyum, Deputy Attorney‑General for Respondent.
Date of hearing:27th April, 1985.
ORDER
ASLAM RIAZ HUSSAIN, J.‑‑Leave is granted to consider the true interpretation of section 10 of Offences in respect of Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984).
The appeal shall be heard at Rawalpindi on a date before the vacation.
In the meanwhile the petitioner Muhammad Aslam son of Ahmad Ali released on interim bail in the sum of Rs.10,000 and two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C. Bahawalpur.
M.I. Leave granted.