Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD MANSHA VS Respondent: M/S. HINO PAK MOTORS LIMITED, KARACHI
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Agha Ali Hyder Title: MUHAMMAD MANSHA vs M/S. HINO PAK MOTORS LIMITED, KARACHI Case No.: Appeal No. KAR-167 of 1992 Date of Judgment:1993-09-29 Reported As: 1994 PLC 81 Result: Appeal dismissed
Judgment DECISION This appeal calls in question the order of the Labour Court No. III dismissing the petition filed under section 25-A, I.R.O. It arose in the following circumstances: 2. It was alleged that the petitioner and the other workers of the respondent had formed a union and informed the organisation about their intention to get it registered. Their ire had been raised and peremptorily his services were terminated verbally on the 30th of May, 1988. Eventually he had filed a petition before the Labour Court. 3. The respondents in their written reply denied that the petitioner had anything to do with them; the petitioner was in the employ of their contractors in the name and style of M/s. Alkhair Services. 4. The petition came to be dismissed as the petitioner himself produced an agreement which was to the effect that, he was a contractor of the respondent. 5. This version of the appellant demonstrably militates with the version of the petitioner that he had chosen to adopt. 6. There is no merit in this appeal and I will dismiss it.