Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SARFARAZ AHMED VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Nazim Hussain Siddiqui, Hamid Ali Mirza Title: SARFARAZ AHMED vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No, 670 of 1996 Date of Judgment:1996-05-30 Reported As: 1999 MLD 1233 Result: Bail allowed
Judgment ORDER ' It is alleged that firing was exchanged between the parties from a close range but admittedly nobody was injured from the either side. This fact by itself requires further probe in the matter. The applicant is in custody since 19-4-1995 and till date even charge has not been framed against the applicant by the Trial Court. Under the circumstances, the applicant is entitled to bail. ' Accordingly, bail is granted to the applicant in the sum of Rs,50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) and P.R. Bond of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.