Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 3227. In this matter between Const. P. 1476/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Umeed Ali and another (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1476/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3227 PARTIES: Umeed Ali and another (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 20-OCT-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-1476 of 2024

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on CMA No.6918/2025 (Urgency) 2. For order on CMA No.6919/2025 (U/S 3&4)

20.10.2025

Petitioner Umeed Ali is present in person Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG Mr. Raza Mian, DSP (Legal-II) CPO --------------------------------

1. Urgent application is allowed. 2. This Court vide order dated 25.8.2025 directed the respondents not to harass the petitioners and to act in accordance with law. The SSP Dadu was also directed to ensure the petitioners' free movement to their village without any interference. However, this Court made it clear that if the private respondents are found t o be involved in any misconduct, the concerned Magistrate will take immediate action against them. A copy of this order has already been sent to the learned concerned Magistrate; however, no action has been taken. The learned Sessions Judge, Dadu is direct ed to look into the matter and resolve the issue of the petitioners by directing the Magistrate to hear the petitioners and if he finds something fishy on the part of the private respondents, he shall immediately take action in accordance with law by provi ding protection to the petitioners. This contempt application is disposed of. The petitioner shall approach the learned Sessions Judge, Dadu accordingly. However, no further application shall be entertained in the disposed of matter. Let a copy of this o rder be transmitted to the learned Sessions Judge, Dadu, for compliance.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant