Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1992 PLC 1235

AINUL HASSAN vs OPAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others

Petitioner: AINUL HASSAN VS Respondent: OPAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Decision Date: 1992-03-19

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Agha Ali Hyder Title: AINUL HASSAN vs OPAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others Case No.: Application No KAR-97 of 1992, Date of Judgment:1992-03-19 Reported As: 1992 PLC 1235 Result: Application dismissed

Judgment DECISION ' There was a complaint filed by Muhammad Javed, General Secretary praying for the prosecution of the respondents under sections 54 and 55, IRO for the breach of the terms of the settlement duly arrived at between the parties. It ended in acquittal. 2. I have gone through the order and also heard Mr. Muhammad Shafiq Qureshi. 3. It has been held by the Labour Court that the contentions put forward by the complainant party are vague and there is no mens rea on the part of the respondents. At any rate there is no misapprehension of any sort involved in the evaluation of the evidence led by the party. There is therefore no ground to interfere in this Revision Application. I will dismiss it in limine.

Related Legal Research & Directories