Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: AINUL HASSAN VS Respondent: OPAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others
Court Name: Labour Appellate Tribunal Judge(s): Agha Ali Hyder Title: AINUL HASSAN vs OPAL LABORATORIES (PVT.) LTD. and 2 others Case No.: Application No KAR-97 of 1992, Date of Judgment:1992-03-19 Reported As: 1992 PLC 1235 Result: Application dismissed
Judgment DECISION ' There was a complaint filed by Muhammad Javed, General Secretary praying for the prosecution of the respondents under sections 54 and 55, IRO for the breach of the terms of the settlement duly arrived at between the parties. It ended in acquittal. 2. I have gone through the order and also heard Mr. Muhammad Shafiq Qureshi. 3. It has been held by the Labour Court that the contentions put forward by the complainant party are vague and there is no mens rea on the part of the respondents. At any rate there is no misapprehension of any sort involved in the evaluation of the evidence led by the party. There is therefore no ground to interfere in this Revision Application. I will dismiss it in limine.