Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner) — 2024 SHC 53

Official Citation: 2024 SHC 53

Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court

Petitioner: Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner)

Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 53. In this matter between Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 6414/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 53 PARTIES: Mariam Khawaja (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 14-JAN-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI C.P. No.D-6414,6415, 6416, 6417 of 2024 _______________________________________________________ Date Order with signature of Judge _______________________________________________________

1.For order on office objection 2.For hearing of CMA No.13529/2025 3.For hearing of CMA No.6908/2025 4.For hearing of CMA No.28657/2024 5.For hearing of CMA No.28658/2024 6.For hearing of main case

14.01.2026

Mr. Ravi Pinjani, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Muhammad Akram Tariq, Advocate for the Respondent No.1

------------------------- Both the learned counsel for the parties have agreed for disposal of these petitions with the consent that the Chairman, Respondent No.1/Evacuee Trust Property Board, shall hear the parties and pass a reasoned and speaking order strictly on merits within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. It is further directed that the issue of limitation shall not come in the way of the petitioners , and the appeal/case of the petitioners shall not be dismissed merely on technical grounds , inc luding limitation, but shall be decided purely on merits in accordance with law . In the intervening period, the petitioners shall not be dispossessed from the subject property. Office to place copy hereof in connected petitions listed above. JUDGE

JUDGE Aadil Arab

Related Legal Research & Directories