Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: BEFORE J AMANAT ALI and others VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza Title: BEFORE J AMANAT ALI and others vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No, 3322-B of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-12-21 Reported As: 1985 MLD 1419 Result: Bail refused
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' The two grounds on which great stress was laid by the learned counsel for bail of the petitioners, who are accused of murderous assault and other offences under the Penal Code, are that two of the co-accused, namely, Ghafoor and Yousaf had been bailed out. Secondly eye-witness by the name of Wilayat Ali exonerated the petitioneRs, ' So far as the case of the co-accused, who have been bailed out, is concerned that is distinguishable. They have been given concession of bail on the ground of merits. ' I have seen the statement of Wilayat Ali. No doubt he has given clearance certificate to the three petitioners, but Ghulam Ali and Ghulam Abbas, who have been injured by the fire-arm, are yet to be examined. Therefore, at this stage I am not inclined to admit the petitioners to bail. The petition is dismissed with the observation that they may apply to the trial Court after the aforesaid two injured have been examined.