Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: APEX FINANCE AND LEASING LTD. VS Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and others
Court Name: Supreme Court of India Judge(s): R. M. Sahai, A. S. Anand Title:APEX FINANCE AND LEASING LTD. vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and
others Case No.: Civil Appeal No,7232 of 1993 Date of Judgment:1993-12-03 Reported As: 1995 PTD 1273 207 I T R 781 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER ' Special leave granted. ' This appeal is directed against the order dated March 25, 1992, of the High Court of Delhi in C. W. P. No, 1178 of 1992, dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 273A of the Income tax Act, 1961 (for-short, the Act"), refusing to waive interest and penalty on the amount voluntarily disclosed by the assessee by way of revised return, without entering into the merits on the ground that the order was not liable to interference in extraordinary jurisdiction. ' Having heard learned counsel for both the parties, we are of the opinion that the question whether the Commissioner of Income-tax, in the facts and circumstances of the case, was justified in refusing to exercise his power under section 273A of the Act was a question which was required to be examined on the merits. Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the controversy, we set aside the order of the High Court and send the case back for decision afresh in accordance with law on the merits. The petition shall be restored to its original number. Parties shall be at liberty to exchange affidavits. The appeal is decided accordingly.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.