Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUNIR AHMAD alias MUNIR VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Ghulam Nabi Soomro Title: MUNIR AHMAD alias MUNIR vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No,148 of 2000 Date of Judgment:2000-05-04 Reported As: 2001 P Cr. L J 114 Result: Bail refused
Judgment ORDER ' The applicants seek bail under sections 393 and 341, P.P.C. Read with section 17(3) (E.H.O.) Ordinance, 1979 pending trial before the Court of learned IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Dadu. The allegation against the applicants is that they alongwith co-accused committed robbery of service pistol from P.W. A.S.-I. Muhammad Aslam and caused him fire-arm injury on a link road going from Bhan Saeedabad Town to Talty at 8-00 p.m. On 8-8-1999. ' It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the co-accused have been released on bail by the learned trial Court. It is further contended that both the injured P.Ws. Namely A.S.-I. Muhammad Aslam and Zulfiqar have not implicated the applicants in their statement under section 164, Cr.P.C. ' Learned A.A.-G. Has opposed the prayer of bail of the applicants stating that two prosecution witnesses namely A.S.-I. Muhammad Aslam and Zulfiqar Ali in the alleged incident of robbery received serious injuries. P.W. A.S.-I. Muhammad Aslam was also deprived of his service pistol and cash of Rs,2,600. The injured prosecution witnesses have implicated the applicants by picking them in the identification parade held before a Magistrate. The service pistol of P.W. A.S.-I. Muhammad Aslam was allegedly secured from the possession of the applicant. The case has not so far proceeded. No case for bail is made out. The application is, therefore, dismissed.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.