Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1992 PLC(CS) 1046

HASSAN SHAH VS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FAISALABAD

Petitioner: HASSAN SHAH VS Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FAISALABADHonorable Justice ABDUL HAMID KHAN

Court: SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

1992 P L C (C

1992 P L C (C.S.) 1046

[Service Tribunal Punjab]

Before Abdul Hamid Khan, Member

HASSAN SHAH

versus

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, FAISALABAD and another

Appeal No. 248 of 1989, decided on 21st February, 1991.

Civil service---

---- Adverse remarks---Adverse remarks recorded by Authority in A.C.R. were challenged on ground that period spent by civil servant under command of Police Officer concerned at different Police Stations was less than 3 months and as such adverse remarks against him did not carry any validity ---Provision of para. 6 of the Inspector-General of Police's Standing Order had prescribed 3 months as minimum period for writing of Confidential Reports and any report recorded in respect of a period less than minimum prescribed period was to be ignored---Authorities having themselves admitted that period of A.C.R. was less than prescribed period of 3 months, order of Authority was set aside by Tribunal, directing that entire report against civil servant should be scored out.

M.A. Riaz for Appellant.

Ch. Manzoor Hussain, District Attorney for Respondents,

Date of hearing: 4th February, 1991.

Related Legal Research & Directories