Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: UMAR DIN VS Respondent: SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and JUDGMENT
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza, Shafi-ur-Rehman Title:UMAR DIN vs SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE and
JUDGMENT
Reported As: 1989 SCMR 1250 Result: Leave granted Judgment JUDGMENT ' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.--This petition merits leave to appeal for the following reasons: (i) Ghulam Rasul respondent No,4 was writ petitioner in the High Court and the appellant in Intra- Court Appeal. In paras. 4 and 5 of Constitutional petition he specifically mentioned that he was aggrieved by the act of informer Umar Din and the adjudication on informer's application. He impleaded Umar Din before Chief Settlement Commissioner but in none of the proceedings before the High Court in spite of an objection taken by Umar Din. (ii) Act XXXVI of 1974 having a retrospective effect clothes an informer with vested rights. (iii) Sections 10 and 11 of Displaced Persons and Land Settlement Act prima facie governed the matter leaving no scope for exercise of the discretion in the matter leaving no scope for the Appeal Bench of the High Court on considerations taken note of in para. 6. ' Security Rupees five thousand. No alienation of land meanwhile.