Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MAHBOOB MURTAZA VS Respondent: THE STATEHonorable Justice Aftab Dino G. MemonShahadat Awan,A.R. Qazi
[Karachi]
Before Aftab Dino G. Memon, J
MAHBOOB MURTAZA‑‑Applicant
versus
THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Criminal Bail Application No. 955 of 1987, decided on 20th August, 1988.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑---
‑‑‑S. 497‑‑Bail‑‑Counsel for accused stated that since case had not yet proceeded he would not press application for bail for the time being, if a erection was issued application for bail dismissed as withdrawn.
Shahadat Awan for Applicant.
A.R. Qazi, Addl. A.‑G. for the State.
ORDER
After arguing this matter for sometime, Mr. Shahadat Awan, learned counsel for the applicant states that since the case has not yet proceeded he will not press this application for the time being, if a direction is given to the trial Court for expeditious disposal. In view of the above statement, the application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, I direct that the trial Judge should proceed with the case expeditiously, and dispose it of within six months. If the trial is not concluded within the above period, the applicant will be at liberty to repeat the bail application before the trial Judge who will decide it on merit.
M.Y.H./M‑539/K Case remanded.