Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMAD ALI VS Respondent: ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR
1988 S C M R 1396
1988 S C M R 1396
Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
MUHAMMAD ALI‑‑Petitioner
versus
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR and another Respondents
Civil Petition No.593 of 1986, decided on 28th May, 1988.
(Against the judgment and order of the Lahore High Court Lahore, dated 22‑4‑1986. in W P. No.693 of 1986) .
Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
‑‑Arts.199 & 185(3)‑‑Leave to appeal‑ ‑Contention that adequate opportunity of hearing was not given to the petitioner‑‑‑ Supreme Court attended to the question but found that writ petition of the petitioner was rightly dismissed‑‑Interference declined by Supreme Court.
Yusuf Farooq, Advocate Supreme Court and Ch. Mehdi Khan Mehtab, Advocate‑ on‑Record for Petitioner
Nemo for Respondents ,
Date of hearing 28th May. 1988
ORDER
MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH. J. ‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by a husband/father in a family matter against the dismissal of his writ petition by the High Court.
This case has arisen out of a maintenance order passed in favour of the children of the petitioner His appeal having been dismissed he also failed to convince the High Court in so far as the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction is concerned.
The point urged by the learned counsel is with regard to the adequate opportunity of hearing. This has duly been attended to.
After hearing him we do not find any justification for interference His writ petition having been rightly dismissed in the High Court, leave to appeal is refused and the petition is dismissed.
M.B A./M‑483/S Leave refused.