Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2026 SHC 597
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Petitioner: Const. P. 55/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Saddique Rabi (Petitioner)
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2026 SHC 597. In this matter between Const. P. 55/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Saddique Rabi (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 55/2026 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2026 SHC KHI 597 PARTIES: Saddique Rabi (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 12-MAR-26 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ 1
ORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
CP No.D-55 of 2026
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE(S).
Hearing of case 1. For order on office objection. 2. For hearing of main case. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
Dated 12.03.2026
Mr. Zahid Iqbal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Abdus Samad, Advocate for NADRA. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner submits that purpose of filing of this petition has been served, therefore, under instructions h e does not press this petition. Learned counsel for the Respondent-NADRA has no objection.
Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as not pressed along with pending application(s), if any.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Ayaz Gul