Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: HYDERABAD RACE CLUB VS Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Court Name: Supreme Court of India Judge(s): B. P. Jeevan Reddy, I. K. T. Thomas Title: HYDERABAD RACE CLUB vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Case No.: Civil Appeal No, 2962 of 1980 Date of Judgment:1996-12-11 Reported As: 1997 PTD 1110 Result: Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT ' The question which was referred for the opinion of the High Court under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, is the following (see (1978) 115 ITR 453, 455): "Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the net wealth of the Hyderabad Race Club is exempt from wealth-tax under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957?" Section 5(1)(i) at the relevant time, and in so far as it is relevant for the present purposes reads as follows: "5.---(1) Subjecf to the provisions of subsection (1A), the wealth tax shall not be payable by an assessee in respect of the following assets, and such assets shall not be included in the net wealth of the assessee... (i) any property held by him under trust or other legal obligation for any public purpose of a charitable or religious nature in India;..." (Emphasis supplied). ' The contention of the appellant that the property held by it is under a legal obligation for a public purpose of charitable nature has not been accepted by the High Court and we are not persuaded to take a different view. Indeed the question whether the Hyderabad Race Club was a charitable organisation was pronounced upon by a Full Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Hyderabad Race Club v. CIT (1985) 153 ITR 521. It was held that it cannot claim to be a charitable organisation. We are told that the special leave petition preferred against the Full Bench decision has also been dismissed by this Court (see (1995) 212 ITR (St.) 375). In this view of the matter, we do not find any substance in this appeal. The appeal is dismissed accordingly. No costs.