Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUNAWAR AHMAD LEGHARI VS Respondent: INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICEHonorable Justice MUHAMMAD MEHMUD ASLAM PIRZADA
1992 P L C (C
1992 P L C (C.S.) 53
[Service Tribunal Punjab]
Present: Muhammad Mehmud Aslam Pirzada Chairman
MUNAWAR AHMAD LEGHARI
Versus
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE and 2 others
Appeal No. 616 of 1990, decided on 9th March, 1991.
Civil service---
---- Adverse remarks ---Expunction---Appellant, Inspector of Police had created problems for his senior officers where he was posted ---Complaints about appellant's work and conduct, from public were also received and even a strike was organised against his behaviour and highhandedness---Appellant had thus brought a bad name to the entire police force---Appellant had been punished seven times under departmental proceedings against him---Range D.I..G. had described appellant as unfit for posting as S.H.O.---Assessment of senior Police Officers about appellant appearing to be correct---Appellant was found often missing from weekly parade as well as from place of his posting-- Appellant was reported as corrupt and his integrity was categorised as `D' and his behaviour with public as "Below Average"---Remarks against appellant having been recorded purely on merit, expunction of adverse remarks was declined in circumstances.
M. Rahim for Appellant.
A.G. Humayun, District Attorney for Respondents.
Date of hearing: 14th February, 1991.