Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as 2024 SHC 3238. In this matter between Const. P. 1099/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi - Muhammad Salman S/o Malik Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 1099/2024 (S.B.) Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION: 2025 SHC KHI 3238 PARTIES: Muhammad Salman S/o Malik Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 03-NOV-25 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ [1]

ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-1099 of 2024

Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1. For order on office objection as at ‘A’ 2. For hearing of CMA No.8343/2025 (U/A 199) 3. For hearing of main case

03.11.2025

Mr. Arbaz Waseem advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG --------------------------------

This is a case of simple harassment. However, the petitioner ’s counsel did not press clause -2 of the prayer clause. Learned Assistant PG pre sent in Court submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, however, if there is a cognizable offence, police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. With this observation, the instant petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s).

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant