Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MALOOK And Another VS Respondent: THE STATE-/Opponent
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Tanzil-ur-Rehman Title: MALOOK And Another vs THE STATE-/Opponent Case No.: Criminal Bail Application No. 598 of 1984 Date of Judgment:1984-07-24 Reported As: 1986 P Cr. L J 632 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER The learned counsel for the applicants contends that applicant No.1 Malook was arrested on 9-2- 1982. He has been in jail for over two years and the trial has not started as yet. Thus, he is entitled to the statutory concession by virtue of section 497(3), Cr.P.C. As regards applicant No.2 Raboo, I have heard both the counsel and perused the order passed by my learned Brother Z.C. Valiani, J., as he then was. The facts stated before me are somewhat identical. B Learned A.A.-G., also concedes to the grant of bail to him on the basis of earlier order passed in Criminal Bail No. 49 of 1983 (Bachu v. The State).