Legal Principle & Question Decided

Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court, officially reported as Const. P. 491/2024 (SHC). In this matter between Const. P. 491/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas - Imtiaz Ali & others (Petitioner) and the Respondent, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.

Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

COURT: Sindh High Court CASE NO: Const. P. 491/2024 (D.B.) Sindh High Court, Circuit Court, Mirpur Khas CITATION: 2024 SHC MPK 11 PARTIES: Imtiaz Ali & others (Petitioner) ORDER DATE: 09-SEP-24 BENCH: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) A.F.R: Yes ------------------------------------------------------------ IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH CIRCUIT COURT MIRPURKHAS

Constitutional Petition No.D-491 of 2024 (Imtiaz Ali & others vs. P.O Sindh and others)

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE Before Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J Amjad Ali Bohio, J

Date of hearing and order 09-09-2024

Mr. Afzal Karim Virk, advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ghulam Nabi Meo, advocate for intervener Mr. Ayaz Ali Rajpar, Additional A.G Sindh a/w Sajjad Ali Khaskheli Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Hussain Bux Mari

= O R D E R Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. Through the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the petitioner s have sought suspension of Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachm ent Mirpurkhas, whereby he had directed the demolition of houses of petitioners citing the land in question to be of Government property. 2. Learned counsel submits that he will challenge the Notice before the Anti Encroachment Tribunal Court or competen t Court for redressal of his grievances. 3. Learned A.A.G. submits that the property in question is government property and this petition is not maintainable. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. 5. It appears from the record that petitioners are calling in question the Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by the Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachment Taluka Hussain Bux Mari on the premise that the petitioners have titled documen ts in their favor issued by the Revenue authorities through registered sale deed and such Khatas are mutated in their names. If this is a position of the case, the issue involved in the

2

proceedings can be resolved by the Anti Encroachment and/or competent Court of law as both the parties claim and counterclaim on the subject property. 6. The instant petition stands disposed of in terms of the preceding paragraphs.

JUDGE

JUDGE

*Ali Sher*

Related Legal Research & Directories

• Browse all judgments from Sindh High Court
• Search Pakistani statutes: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, PPC, CrPC, CPC & Family Laws
• Analyze this case with Al Wakeelo AI Legal Assistant