Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Official Citation: 2025 PTD 571
Court / Jurisdiction: Sindh High Court
Year of Decision: 2021
Decision Date: 2021-09-10
Parties: Collector of Customs through Additional Collector of Customs vs Messrs Singer Pakistan
Ruling Summary: This decision was rendered by the Sindh High Court on 2021-09-10, officially reported as 2025 PTD 571. In this matter between Collector of Customs through Additional Collector of Customs and Messrs Singer Pakistan, the court adjudicated key questions of statutory construction, procedural regularity, and legal precedent under Pakistani law.
Core Holding: The honorable bench evaluated governing statutory provisions and judicial authorities to establish the rights of the parties, delivering the binding reasoning set out below.
Case cited as 2025 PTD 571
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Agha Faisal Title:Collector of Customs through Additional Collector of Customs vs Messrs
Singer Pakistan Case No.:Special Customs Reference Application No.1236 of 2015 and C.M.A. No.3314 of 2015 Date of Judgment:2021-09-10 Reported As: 2025 PTD 571 Result: Reference dismissed Judgment
ORDER This Special Customs Reference Application involves a show-cause notice dated 21.02.2014 followed by an Order-in-Original No.50 of 2014-2015 and judgment of the Customs Appellate Tribunal in Customs Appeal No.K-1113 of 2014 and Customs Appeal No.K-661 of 2015. We have heard learned counsel appearing for the applicant and perused the record. The subject consignment, as imported by the respondent, pertains to the regime prior to the amendments carried out in Section 32 of the Customs Act, 1969. The main controversy was that custom authorities acting as a collecting agent of customs, excise sales tax have jurisdiction under the law and accordingly respective Tribunals were operating and functioning in the like manner. The show-cause notice for short levy of the respective taxes under income tax, sales tax and excise etc. are to be independently resurrected in their own regime. The customs at the time of import acted as a collecting agent however once the goods have been released then the respective/concerned department would act on their own hierarchy for the recovery of these taxes. Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 as well as Sales Tax Act, 1990 provides a specific procedure for collection of taxes and have their respective forums for enforcing and recovering the short payment made by the importers. Hence, the recovery of un-collected taxes could not be entrusted upon customs officials once the goods have been imported and out of charge. This was however a situation prior to the amendment carried out under section 32 of the Customs Act, 1969 on the basis of which the subject show-cause notice was issued on 21.02.2014, which was issued on the
---
## Page 2
basis of a contravention report of 10.12.2012 regarding concessional rates in income tax at the rate of 3% on the import of raw material. Thus prior to 2014 before the amendment was carried out in section 32 the object could not have been legitimately carried out. The proposed moot question No.1 i.e. "Whether the Appellate Tribunal has not erred in law by not considering that the powers for recovery of short levied tax is vested to customs authorities in terms of Section 32 read with Section 202 of the Customs Act?, as such is answered in negative in favour of respondent and against the applicant, leaving the remaining questions, as proposed by the applicant redundant. Resultantly this Special Customs Reference Application is dismissed along with listed application. A copy of the order be sent under the seal of the Court and the signature of the Registrar to the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue Karachi in terms of Section 196(5) of Customs Act, 1969.