Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1970 PCRLJ 249
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year: 1969
Decision Date: 1969-12-31
Parties: Ch. FEROZE DIN vs DR. K. M. MUNIR AND ANOTHER
249 Result: Leave refused Judgment JUDGMENT SAJJAD AHMAD, J.-This order will dispose of Criminal Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 30 and 31 of 1969, which are directed against the order of a Division Bench of the High Court of West Pakistan, whereby the petitioner's application under section 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code for lodging complaint against the respondents for their having made use of certain orders of allotment during the proceedings in the Court, which were allegedly forged, has been dismissed.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Hamoodur Rahman, Sajjad Ahmad Jan, Muhammad Yaqub Ali Khan Title: Ch. FEROZE DIN vs DR. K. M. MUNIR AND ANOTHER Case No.:Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6060 of 1968 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6061 of JUDGMENT Reported As: 1970 P Cr. L J 249 Result: Leave refused Judgment JUDGMENT SAJJAD AHMAD, J.-This order will dispose of Criminal Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal Nos. 30 and 31 of 1969, which are directed against the order of a Division Bench of the High Court of West Pakistan, whereby the petitioner's application under section 476 of the Criminal Procedure Code for lodging complaint against the respondents for their having made use of certain orders of allotment during the proceedings in the Court, which were allegedly forged, has been dismissed. The petitioner and the respondents are rival contestants for transfer of an evacuee building situated in Gandhi Square, Lahore. The dispute was ultimately brought in the High Court under Article 98 of the 1962-Constitution and in the result it was remanded back to the Settlement Commissioner for a fresh consideration of the claims of all the contending parties. The High Court has declined to initiate criminal proceedings against the respondents as prayed for by the petitioner on the ground that it was inappropriate to start collateral proceedings which would hamper -the main issue to be decided by the Settlement Commissioner, viz. The respective entitlements of the parties to the…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.