Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ANWAR ALI VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Rafique Tarar Title: ANWAR ALI vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1150-B of 1989 Date of Judgment:1989-04-16 Reported As: 1989 MLD 4170 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER This is a petition for bail on behalf of Anwar A.I petitioner/accused in a case under Section 14 of Ordinance VI of 1979. 2. The case was registered on the report of Abbas A.I, brother-in-law of the petitioner, wherein he alleged that the petitioner stayed at his house and during his absence took away Rs. 40,000 in cash, ornaments and a lady wrist watch. During the investigation some ornaments and wrist watch were recovered from him which were taken into possession vide memo dated 24-10--1988. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has been falsely implicated due to family dispute and in any case the offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause. The learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for bail. 4. I have considered the submission made at the Bar in the light of material available on the record. The petitioner was arrested on 23-10-1988. He is in jail for the last about six months. The offence does not fall within the prohibitory clause of Section 497 Cr.P.C. 1, therefore, admit him to bail in the sum of Rs. 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A.C. Mianwali. M.Y.H./A-677/L
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.