Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ABDUL GHAFOOR VS Respondent: StateHonorable Justice Muhammad Moosa K. LeghariKhadim Hussain D. Solangi,Anwar H. Ansari
2007 P Cr
2007 P Cr. L J 55
[Karachi]
Before Muhammad Moosa K. Leghari, J
ABDUL GHAFOOR----Applicant
Versus
THE STATE----Respondent
Criminal Bail Application No.S-602 of 2006, decided on 16th October, 2006.
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)---
----Ss. 497 & 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.337-A(ii), 337-F(i), 504 & 34---Pre-arrest and after arrest bail, grant of---Counter-cases---Cases had been challaned and maximum punishment provided for the injuries sustained by injured, was five years---State counsel had not extended objection to grant of bail to accused---Accused was granted after arrest bail, whereas interim pre-arrest bail granted to co-accused was confirmed accordingly.
Khadim Hussain D. Solangi for Applicant.
Anwar H. Ansari for the State.
ORDER
MUHAMMAD MOOSA K. LEGHARI, J.--- It is argued that there are counter-cases. The applicants have been falsely implicated for malice reasons. The cases have been challaned and the maximum punishment provided for the injuries sustained by Abdul Karim is five years.
Learned State counsel has, therefore, stated no objection.
On consideration of the arguments it appears that contentions raised are not without force and, therefore, learned State Counsel has rightly extended no objection. In the circumstances, applicant Abdul Ghafoor is granted bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 (Rupees Fifty thousand) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court, whereas interim pre-arrest bail granted to applicants Ghulam Mustafa and Ghulam Nabi is confirmed on the same terms and conditions.
H.B.T./A-130/K????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Bail granted.