Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: FAISAL HYDRANT VS Respondent: PROVINCE OF SINDH and others
Court Name: Sindh High Court Judge(s): Anwar Zaheer Jamali, Syed Zawwar Hussain Jaffery Title: FAISAL HYDRANT vs PROVINCE OF SINDH and others Case No.: C.P. No.D-1059 of 2004 Date of Judgment:2004-10-05 Reported As: 2005 CLC 1391 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER ' ANWAR ZAHEER JAMALI, J.--- During the course of her arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner has invited our attention to the order, dated 16-8-2001 passed in C.P. No,D-1551 of 2001 to show that the present petitioner and other co-petitioners in that petition, challenged actions of respondents relating to closure of their hydrants, had been depositing the licence fee at the revised rate with the Nazir of this Court regularly. She submitted that despite pendency of such petition and the order referred above, the respondents are again threatening to close down their hydrants by illegal means. In our view, when a petition relating to same controversy is already pending before this Court, it will be more appropriate that the petitioner shall seek any further relief relating to same dispute by filing interlocutory application in such proceedings instead of filing present petition. With these observations this petition is disposed of along with the listed application.