Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Citation: 1970 PLC 884
Court: Labour Court
Year: 1969
Decision Date: 1969-12-31
Parties: EMDAD UDDIN vs MESSRS RAJ BROTHERS, DACCA
Case cited as 1970 PLC 884
Court Name: Labour Court Judge(s): Muhammad Karim, S. A. Hakem, Nurul Islam Khan Title: EMDAD UDDIN vs MESSRS RAJ BROTHERS, DACCA Case No.: Complaint Case No. 1 of 1970 Date of Judgment:- Reported As: 1970 PLC 884 Result: application is dismissed Judgment ORDER MD. NURUL ISLAM KHAN (CHAIRMAN).-This is an application under section 25 (1) (b) of the East Pakistan Employment of Labour (Standing Orders) Act, 1965, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The case of the first party is that he was a permanent worker under the second party till the date of verbal dismissal on 26-12-69. His last pay was Rs. 125.00: He worked for more than 2 years under the second party. After enjoying the Eid holidays he came to resume duties on 24-I2-69. But he was told to come on 26-1 2-69 on which date he was dismissed. He sent a grievance petition. But the second party refused to accept the same. He claimed termination benefits. The second party entered into appearance by filing a written statement in which It was-stated that the case was false, frivolous and baseless. The facts of the case according to the second party are that the first party joined the second party's firm: on 16-4-68. The petitioner then resigned on his own volition on 10-12-67, and all his arrear claim was paid. Points for determination are: -- (1) Whether the first party was verbally dismissed as, claimed by him.? (2) What relief, if any, the petitioner is entitled to? FINDINGS AND DECISION Both the points are taken up…
Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.