Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MULAZIM HUSSAZIN SHAH VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Khawaja Muhammad Sharif, M. Naeem-ullah Khan Sherwani Title: MULAZIM HUSSAZIN SHAH vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No,3637/B of 2001 Date of Judgment:2001-07-16 Reported As: 2001 YLR 354(1) Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER ' Fourteen accused were mentioned in the F.I.R. 10 were named and four were unknown. F.I.R. Was lodged by Khan Shah, two persons Tanveer Abbas and Ashiq Hussain were injured but no specific injury is attributed to them. In fact, allegation against the petitioner is that he fired a shot but did not hit anybody. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, that he has been sent to judicial lock-up, that case is of further inquiry. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that no injury is attributed to the petitioner, that though he fired a shot but nobody received any injury from his hands. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. In the instant case, petitioner fired a shot but the same did not hit anybody. In our view, it is a case of further inquiry; therefore, this petition is accepted. Petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs,50,000 (fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.