Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

1988 SCMR 1378

SHAH MUHAMMAD VS GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Petitioner: SHAH MUHAMMAD VS Respondent: GHULAM MUHAMMADHonorable Justice Muhammad Afzal Zullah

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

1988 S C M R 1378

1988 S C M R 1378

Present: Muhammad Afzal Zullah and Saad Saood Jan, JJ

SHAH MUHAMMAD and another‑‑Petitioners

versus

GHULAM MUHAMMAD and another‑‑Respondents

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.348 of 1983, decided on 21st May, 1988.

(On appeal from the judgment dated 10‑1‑1983 of the Lahore High Court, Lahore, passed in C.R. No.1033 of 1982).

Punjab Pre‑emption Act (I of 1913)‑‑

‑‑‑S.21‑‑Pre‑emption suit‑‑Payment of Zar‑i‑Punjab‑‑Delay‑‑Error on the part of Court functionaries‑‑Effect.

Ch. Ijaz Ahmad, Advocate Supreme Court and Tanvir Ahmad, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioners.

Abdul Majid Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and‑ Hamid Aslam Qureshi, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondents.

Date of hearing: 21st May, 1988.

ORDER

MUHAMMAD AFZAL ZULLAH, J.‑‑Leave to appeal has been sought by the vendees in a pr‑emption matter. The

challenge is to the determination of two questions by the learned Courts below; one relating to payment of court‑fee and the other relating to the payment of Zar‑i‑Punjam. The impugned decisions having gone against the petitioners, they have now sought leave to appeal.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has not pressed the question of court‑fee on account of the judgment of this Court in the case of Siddique Khan (P L D 1986 S C 289). With regard to Zar‑I- Punjab he has reiterated the same argument (of late payment), as was raised before the High Court in Civil Revision. It was repelled with reference to the justification for accepting the delayed payment. The respondents were not to be blamed, there was some error on the part of the Court functionaries. In any case, no justification has been made out for interference by this Court, leave to appeal is, accordingly, refused and the petition is dismissed.

M. B. A . /S‑150/S Leave refused.

Related Legal Research & Directories