Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: P..SATHRUGHAN PILLAI VS Respondent: COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX
Court Name: Supreme Court of India Judge(s): V. Ramaswa mi, S. Ranganathan, Yogeshwar Dayal Title: P..SATHRUGHAN PILLAI vs COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Case No.:Civil Appeals Nos. 380 to 382 of 1977 Income-tax References Nos. 97, 98
and 105 of 1974 Date of Judgment:1992-03-10 Reported As: 1993 PTD 891 Result: Appeals dismissed Judgment ORDER The question raised in these appeals which are under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, is whether the liability for payment of gratuity to employees in terms of the Kerala Industrial Employees (Payment of Gratuity) Act, 1970, is deductible as a debt owing on the valuation date. The High Court has applied the decision of this Court in the case of Standard Mills Co. Ltd. v. CWT (1967) 63 ITR 470 SC, the principle of which was reiterated in Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. v. CWT (1974) 93 ITR 603 (SC). Learned counsel for the appellants seeks to persuade us to reconsider the decision in the case of Standard Mills Co. Ltd. (1967) 63 ITR 470 (SC). Apart from the fact that we see no reasons to doubt the correctness of this decision which has held the field for about 25 years and has also been reaffirmed in the subsequent decisions of this Court, we are also informed that the stakes involved in the present appeals are only a few hundred rupees each. In these circumstances, we do not think that there is any justification to think of reconsidering the said decision. The appeals, therefore, fail and stand dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.