Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: ALI MUHAMMAD VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Zafar Pasha Ch. Title: ALI MUHAMMAD vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No,1212/B of 2002 Date of Judgment:2002-02-20 Reported As: 2002 YLR 1021(1) Result: Bail not allowed.
Judgment ORDER ' Seeks bail on the ground that the petitioner and his companions have also received injuries. They came up with the counter-version which is still to be verified. Further submits that the offence alleged against the petitioner is not hit by the prohibitory clause. The question whether, which of the parties is aggressor and whether' the petitioner's counter-version is correct is open to further inquiry. The petitioner is in the judicial lock-up and as such is not required for further investigation. He is, therefore, admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,50,000 with one surety to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. 2. In case the petitioner misuses the concession be hampers the trial, in any manner, the learned trial Court will be at liberty to withdraw the bail. Bail not allowed.