Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

NUR AHMED AND Others vs PUTUL RANI PAUL AND Another — 1970 SCMR 805

Citation: 1970 SCMR 805

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan

Year: 1969

Decision Date: 1969-12-31

Parties: NUR AHMED AND Others vs PUTUL RANI PAUL AND Another

Headnotes

Case cited as 1970 SCMR 805

Judgment Text

Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s): Hamoodur Rahman, Mujibur Rahman Khan Title: NUR AHMED AND Others vs PUTUL RANI PAUL AND Another Case No.:Criminal Revision No. 896 of 1968 Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 2- JUDGMENT Reported As: 1970 SCMR 805 Result: Petition dismissed Judgment JUDGMENT M. R. KHAN, J.-The petitioners were convicted under section 379 of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 50, each and in default, to suffer rigorous imprison--ment for one month, each. The petitioners' appeal against their conviction and sentences was dismissed. A revisional application moved in the High Court of East Pakistan by the petitioners was also dismissed by a learned Single Judge of that Court. The petitioners now seek special leave against the order of the High Court dismissing that criminal revision. The allegation against the petitioners was that they trespassed into the land of the complainant Putul Rani Paul on the 14th July 1967, and reaped away half-ripe paddy grown in that land by the complainant. The petitioners pleaded innocence 'and took the defence that the land was in possession of one Abul Faiz and that it was he who had cut and taken away the paddy. The prosecu--tion examined six witnesses including the complainant. They were all eye-witnesses to the occurrence. Their evidence was believed by both the trying Magistrate and the appellate Court. As this concurrent finding was based on evidence, the learned Judge of the High…

Read the full judgment on Al Wakeelo — Pakistan's AI-powered legal research platform.