Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: MUHAMMD HASIL VS Respondent: PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Zafarullah Title: MUHAMMD HASIL vs PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Case No.: Revision Application No, 2 of 1983 Date of Judgment:1983-04-16 Reported As: 1984 PLC (C. S.) 464 Result: Petition dismissed
Judgment ORDER ' The petitioner seeks review of my order on the ground that the rule laid down in the case of Pakistan Television Corporation v. Babar Zaman (1981 PLC 219) has been omitted from consideration. I am afraid, the facts of that case do not relate to the facts of the present case. The petitioner is a road Inspector and in my view he is a civil servant. The learned counsel has, however, argued that the petitioner has no remedy before the Service Tribunal as the period of limitation provided for the appeal before the Service Tribunal has expired. This, however, is no ground for allowing a writ petition and thus conferring a jurisdiction on the Labour Court which otherwise dots not vest in them. The petition is dismissed.