Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SHER DIL VS Respondent: THE STATE and another
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pakistan Judge(s):Zia Pervez, Saiyed Saeed Ashhad, Allama Rashid Ahmed Jullundhari,
Allama Khalid Mehmood Title: SHER DIL vs THE STATE and another Case No.: Criminal Appeal No,4(S),of 2002 Date of Judgment:2008-01-10 Reported As: 2008 SCMR 904 Result: Order accordingly Judgment ORDER Mr. Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court for the appellant says that the parties have patched up their disputes and have entered into a compromise. He further submits that the appellant has been wrongly convicted under section 396, P.P.C., as in view of the facts of the case he could not have been guilty under section 396, P.P.C. Or for the offence of robbery but could be held liable only for causing death and would be held guilty of murder under section 302, P.P.C. Which is a compoundable offence. However, there is no compromise deed on record. It is also noted that on 23-12-2005 this Court had directed the appellant to provide copies of statements of the witnesses. Mr. Muhammad Munir Peracha, Advocate Supreme Court says that the compromise deed has been provided in the office but the same has not yet been put up before us. 2. Adjourned to enable the office to annex the compromise deed with the paper. Legal heirs of the appellant who are present in Court today are not required to appear on the next date of hearing.