Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: UMAR HAYAT and another VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Mian Muhammad Najum-uz-Zaman Title: UMAR HAYAT and another vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No.7524-B of 2003 Date of Judgment:2004-01-15 Reported As: 2004 MLD 1275 Result: Order accordingly
Judgment ORDER ' On 14-9-2003, at about 7-30 p.m. Upon a secret information that near the Sand dune in Chak No.268 some persons duly armed with the fire-arms in official uniforms are sitting and had made preparation for committing dacoity, a raid was conducted by the police, Umer Hayat and Muhammad Naafi alias Saeed petitioners alongwith other co-accused were arrested and case F.I.R. No.709 of 2003, dated 14-9-2003 under sections 171/399/402, P.P.C. Police Station Saddar Jhang was registered. 2. Bail is sought on the grounds that mere gathering at the place of occurrence alongwith fire- arms is not sufficient to attract the provisions of sections 399/402, P.P.C.; that the petitioners have been involved malafidely because of their enmity with the informer of this case. Conversely learned Counsel for the State vehemently opposed this bail application. 3. Heard. File perused. Admittedly trial in this case has already commenced and at this stage it is not appropriate to give any findings qua the factual aspect of the case lest it may prejudice the case pending before the trial Court. This petition stands disposed of with the direction to the trial Court to proceed with the matter expeditiously and conclude the same within six months.
---
## Page 2
revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.