Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2000 PTD 3333

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs R. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR

Petitioner: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VS Respondent: R. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR

Court: Madras High Court Decision Date: 2000-11-26

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Madras High Court Judge(s): N. V. Balasubramanian, P. Thangavel Title: COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs R. RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR Case No.: Case No. 1265 of 1985 Date of Judgment:2000-11-26 Reported As: 2000 PTD 3333 Result: Order accordingly

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT N.V. BALASUBRAMANIAN, J.---Pursuant to the directions of this Court in T.C.P. No 358 of 1983, dated January 23, 1984, the Appellate Tribunal has stated a case and referred the following question of law for our consideration: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that only the not interest income from Indian Overseas Bank, Colombo, after deduction of tax deducted at source should be included in the assessee's case and not the gross interest?" The point that arises is whether the not interest income received by the assessee from the Indian Overseas Bank, Colombo, after deduction of tax at source is taxable or whether the gross interest income is taxable. The Appellate Tribunal held that tax can be levied only on the not income received after granting deduction of tax at source in Srilanka. This Court, however, in A.F.W. Low v. CIT (1995) 211 ITR 213, held that the gross dividend income should be regarded as having accrued or arisen or received by the assessee and it is only with reference to the gross income, the tax can be levied. Though the decision reported in A.F.W: Low's case (1995) 211 ITR 213 (Mad.), was dealing with a case of dividend, the principle laid down in that case would equally apply to the case pertaining to the interest income as well. Accordingly, we hold that the Tribunal was not correct in holding that the tax can be levied only on the not interest income. Accordingly, we answer the question of law referred to us in the negative and in favour of the Revenue. There will be no order as to costs.

Related Legal Research & Directories