Al Wakeelo logo

Al Wakeelo

Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty

Initializing Secure Chambers

2002 YLR 3569

MUNAWAR ALI vs THE STATE

Petitioner: MUNAWAR ALI VS Respondent: THE STATE

Court: Lahore High Court Decision Date: 2002-04-02

Full Judgment Text & Judicial Ruling

Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Raja Muhammad Sabir Title: MUNAWAR ALI vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No, 627-B of 2002 Date of Judgment:2002-04-02 Reported As: 2002 YLR 3569 Result: Bail granted

Judgment ORDER Petitioner seeks post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,314 of 2001 dated 3-6-2001 registered under sections 337-A(ii), 337-F(v), 452/34, P.P.C. at Police Station Noor Shah District, Shaiwal. 2. Allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith the co-accused Yasin and Shaban launched attack on Khan Muhammad. He has caused one hatchet injury on the head of Khan Muhammad and another handle below on his right eye. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the medical report does not corroborate the allegations of the complainant. He further submits that Shaban co-accused with similar allegation has been granted bail by this Court on 11-2-2002, therefore, the petitioner is also entitled to the grant of bail. 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail. 5. Heard. Record perused. Khan Muhammad has not received any injury on the right eye according to the Medico Legal Report. The injury on forehead attributed to the petitioner has not fractured any bone of the victim. The offence alleged against the petitioner do not fall within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. He is in jail for the last about nine months. His co-accused having similar role, has already been granted bail by this Court. The complete challan has not been submitted so far. The conclusion of the trial likely to take considerable long period. Keeping in view- the aforesaid circumstances petitioner is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs,50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

Related Legal Research & Directories