Al Wakeelo
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Your Digital Lawyer, Always on Duty
Initializing Secure Chambers
Petitioner: SAJJAD AHMAD VS Respondent: THE STATE
Court Name: Lahore High Court Judge(s): Muhammad Farrukh Mehmood Title: SAJJAD AHMAD vs THE STATE Case No.: Criminal Miscellaneous No, 1066/B of 2001 Date of Judgment:2001-11-29 Reported As: 2002 YLR 3854 Result: Bail granted
Judgment ORDER Sajjad Ahmad petitioner has sought his post-arrest bail in case F. I. R . No,213 of 2001 registered at Police Station Trinda Muhammad Panah, District Rahimyar Khan on 10-9-2001. 2. Precisely, the allegation against the petitioner is that he was armed with a Sota and gave a Sota blow on the left wrist of the complainant, which resulted into fracture and dislocation. 3. The petitioner was arrested in this case on 26-9-2001 and is in judicial lock-up. 4. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the record. Admittedly, the offence under section 337-F (vi), P.P.C. does not fall within the mischief of prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. and in such-like cases the grant of bail should be a rule and refusal an exception as laid down in the cases of Muhammad Ameer v. The State 1973 PCr.LJ 205, and Tariq Bashir v. The State PLD 1995 SC 34. No exceptional circumstance has been mentioned so as to refuse the bail to the petitioner. Therefore, I admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs,50,000 (Rupees fifty thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.